52 Reflections Project

A weekly journal of my thoughts and experiences in education

  • Leave Audio Comments

    Send Me A Message
  • Participate in my Survey

  • Recent Comments

    Fontanelle on 14 – Placement Test…
    katie on 14 – Placement Test…
    katie on 13 – Course Evaluat…
    Wahoo on 11 – Professional D…
    Highlights from the … on 13 – Course Evaluat…
  • Top Posts

    • None
  • Archive for June, 2007

    14 – Placement Tests

    Posted by selfwalker on June 21, 2007

    Pre-tests are commonly used in math education and in other disciplines as a placement test. Usually when a student takes one of these placement tests they just completed a section of courses. Then the institution, such as a public school or a college, uses a rubric to determine how to appropriately match up their skills with a new course. My first experience with a placement test was in the seventh grade. The test was to see which students would be placed on the advanced math track. My score was high enough to placed into the high track but I denied it. The excuse I gave was that I was not ready, but the truth was that I did not want to be challenged, or in others words I was afraid of taking a risk of possible failure. My other experience was during my orientation for college. I tested into Calculus I and I clearly remember that class. There were plenty of students who already took Pre-Calculus or Calculus in high school and these students always seemed to be one step ahead of the material. As a result, I frequently became intimidated of these students’ knowledge and overwhelmed of a feeling that I do not belong in the class. The reason why I am reflecting on these past experiences is because I now teach at a community college where students take a placement test and the majority qualify into developmental math. This is new for me because when I taught 8th grade, my students where those that passed seventh grade. But now my student population is much more diverse. It ranges from a factory worker who has not been in school for 20 years to a 20 year old who is attending community college because of their parents. The math understanding that these students have is just as diverse too. It ranges from not knowing multiplication facts to “I think I know it but I definitely need a refresher”. So I question if these students are experiencing the same emotions I was as an seventh grader and as a college freshmen. Furthermore is this normal, is this healthy, and is this the way it should be?

    Let’s first examine my seventh grade fear of not wanting to be challenged. As a student enters a math class how challenged should they be? One aspect about this is that certain students can handle being pressured or being challenged much easier than others. While some students rise to the challenge, others will completely shut down. This then makes it difficult to formulate a blanket statement about how students should be academically challenged. However, educators can counter attack this issue by making a conscious effort to challenge all student in their classroom. I have yet to have a class where all students had the same level of understanding. The class’s understanding has always fit under a bell curve. Perhaps, all that an educator can do is properly communicate with a student why or why not they are not accepting a challenge, such as being in a higher level class or not performing at their best. Of course, finding the time to have these conversations is challenge within it self.

    The other emotion I had related to a placement test was the intimidation I experienced after being placed into my college calculus class. I believe that this one is very common in the developmental math classes. The math taught in these courses range from fourth grade to ninth grade material. So when a student who does not take the placement test serious and gets put into a class that is lower than they believe they should be, often these student make comments that can be intimidating for other students. For example, they might say, “I know this, it so easy!” or “Can I just do the short cut?” or “Come on who really does not know this stuff?” This perspective of people being better than me or me being better than others is common in the classroom. This might be shedding light to the confidence level of a student, which in math class can be large barrier. Again, the main issue here is how the developmental level of the learner side can have a tremendous impact on a student. For me, I would say that I did not truly develop into a college student until late sophomore year. It took me a year and half to mature out of my high school habits. Academically I was prepared but as learner I was not. As a result, I did not know how to handle others being ahead of me and how to manage challenges. Hopefully, I share my experience with students who are in the same boat. Then they might become aware of how the math is not intimidating them, rather it is the discomfort of not knowing how to handle a challenge or a difficulty.

    I never had to take a placement test for my master’s of math program. The GRE is a some what of a placement test but it is not specifically designed to place students in a certain class. It used to measure the requirments of a college. Yet, suppose I was required to take a math placement test. Would I be able to test into graduate level math classes? After teaching 8th grade math for five years, I can only imagine how difficult it would have been for me. For instance, a graduate level math course is Analysis. It is an intense version of calculus and the last time I took a calculus course was about eight years. As the saying goes, if you don’t use it then you will loose it; and it was pretty much gone from my brain. So does this mean that if I am going to take graduate level courses that I need to be efficient with my calculus skills? Re-taking those classes could set me back a year, which translates to more money for a masters. Again, my current students who are taking developmental math could be thinking the same thing. “I have to take all of these low level courses, that don’t count for any credit, even before I take my required math class?” I cannot fairly comment on the pros and cons pertaining to these developmental courses due to my small experience teaching them. The most important thing I can do is to share my own experiences and to continue reflecting on the level impact it has on my students.

    Posted in classroom dynamics, developmental classes, education, self evaluation, student needs, student perspective, student-teacher communication, testing | 2 Comments »

    13 – Course Evaluations

    Posted by selfwalker on June 7, 2007

    Recently, I was given the results from my student evaluations. These came from the spring semester of 2007 and both classes were College Algebra. The evaluation consists of 19 questions and students are given 5 choices to respond on each question. The possible responses are strongly disagree, disagree, undecided, agree, and strongly agree. Since this was my fourth semester teaching, I have gone through this evaluations process four times. Now, I want to think critically about the questions on this evaluation because I question how these evaluations can provide insights about my teaching. But maybe the purpose of the evaluation is only to allow students an opportunity to express their thoughts about the class? Therefore I should examine the questions and see what possible thoughts I could receive from the evaluations.

    Question #1: Overall, I would rate this instructor as excellent.

    For those students that responded with disagree does this meant that they feel that I am not quite excellent, such as good or great? Or do they feel that I am terrible? If the students agreed, then what does excellent mean? The issue with question is that it is set up to be all or nothing. I am either excellent or not. Perhaps a student could first define an “excellent instructor”. Then I could easily see how I am or not meeting their definition.

    Question #2: Overall, I would rate this course as excellent.

    Again, the question is very vague and it does not allow a proper critique of my classroom. I doubt that if McDonald’s was taking a survey they would ask, “Overall, I would rate McDonald’s as excellent.” Their questions would be clear and to the point. Therefore, a definition of excellent classroom is certainly needed. Maybe another series of questions could be this. What type of learning style do you believe you are? How do you think this class is reaching your learning style? How do you think this class is not reaching your learning style? Questions like these could possibly expose the strengths and weaknesses of my classroom, thus giving me specific areas to improve.

    Question #3: I learned a great deal in this course.

    This College Algebra course consists mostly of material that students have already seen in high school. So if a student does strongly disagree with this question, then they could be responding from the fact that they already knew the information being taught. Or their disagreement could be rooted in a lack of growth in understanding. I suggest that there be a question that asks the student how much of the material they were already familiar with. Plus, the phrase a “great deal” is different for many.

    Question #4: The instructor had a valuable influence on me while in college.

    Is this possible during just one semester? For those students that agreed, I would have to question them how. If I was truly to be an influence while their in college, I would still be impacting them even after completing my class. I say this because if someone is to have an influence on another, then the greatest influence is when that individual is on not there to motivate or pressure them. I think the question should take out “in college” and replace it with “attending the course”. Also, I am curious of what valuable influences I making on my students. Having them make a list of valuable influences would allow me to gain a deeper understanding of what I am doing in the classroom has the greatest impact.

    Question #5: The instructor made class stimulating and challenging.

    I like this question because one of my goals is to create a class that is stimulating and challenging for students and myself. However, I wonder how many students view challenging as impossible or too hard? Again, I am running into how subjective these questions are. Is it possible to write a fill in the blank evaluation that is not subjective? YES! But, that could involve re-writing the entire evaluation, which I am thinking may not be too bad of an idea.

    Question #6: The instructor met class as scheduled.

    Finally, a question clear and to the point. I had to laugh though when I saw that one student marked strongly disagree, another marked disagree, and also one for undecided. I did miss one class due to the birth of my son and I showed up to class a minute or so late a couple of times. Yet does my attendance warrant a strongly agree or agree? Well, 58\% (25/43) of my students marked agree. This percentage makes me question just how different is the response “agree” from “strongly agree”. Maybe I should lump these responses into three categories: no, I don’t know, and yes. Let us go back to the student that marked strongly disagree. A response like this, one that make no sense, reveals a possible instance of a student not reading the questions and simply filling in circles randomly. How often does this happen? Should these evaluations be voluntary? Not requiring students might take care of those who do not want to offer any input. Or if the evaluations had open response questions, it would deter students from just filling in circles randomly. Another possibility is that students feel that their opinions will not be heard or that they will not be respected.

    I have only examined 6 of the 19 questions but looking at the other 13, I feel that the points stated above would be repeated. The thing is that I have already gathered input, concerning the class, from students all through semester. At the half way point, students wrote a one page, single spaced reflection about the class. This assignment had a huge impact on how I taught the rest of the semester and I feel that students felt like they were being heard. However, these evaluations offer little guidance on how I could improve my class or what I should keep doing. Maybe I am taking these evaluations too serious and I am trying to use in way that they were not intended. I guess they could be part of a procedure that is required by the university. This is fine. But why not optimize the evaluations, or in other words, kill two birds with one stone? I believe that we should use the evaluations to their greatest potential with our students so that we as educators can be at or beyond our greatest potential.

    Posted in class development, education, evaluations, self evaluation, student perspective, student-teacher communication | 2 Comments »

     
    Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.